CHIROPRACTIC EXCELLENCE

Have you ever bet on the horses, played two-up or any other form of gambling? The nature of this industry is that the most likely outcome is also the least rewarding one! Bet on a horse that has odds of 2/1 and most likely it is going to win, but you are only going to get a little bit of extra cash for this achievement. On the other hand if the horse you bet on is 100/1, more than likely you are going to be waiting for a while after the winner passes the post to see your horse cross the line - but IF he does win then you are going to get a great return on your “investment”.

What if there was a “game of chance” that paid higher dividends when the odds/ratio was also going to make your bet the most likely winner? Wouldn’t this mean less time wasted looking for the “long shot” and bigger returns on your investment? Fortunately such a “game” does exist - it’s called chiropractic…

Did you know that two separate research processes have confirmed and agreed on the “odds ratio” for subluxation probabilities? That is; a patient is lying prone on your adjusting table - which level of the spine is most likely to be subluxated, and hence is the fist level of the spine that you should always check? Why would you waste your time looking at the least likely spinal level first? If you knew the ranking list of primary subluxations then you would save yourself a LOT of time, as on average you would find EVERY subluxation quicker. The less time it takes to find it, the less time it will take to fix it: Less time CAN be converted to more money.

So what is this ranking list I hear you ask? Unfortunately space does not allow me to cover this comprehensively. To give you a hint though - If you take the name of one of the most-used low-force techniques and reverse the order of the words, you have the first and second most likely primary subluxations on the planet. The rest of the list is covered thoroughly during the Torque Release Technique Program, including the differential diagnostic tests that reliably tell you whether each segment needs to be adjusted, OR NOT, and what correctional vectors will give you the greatest return from your adjustment.

Click Here To Find Out More About TRT Training…

Imagine if every Australian was allowed to receive one adjustment per week, and that adjustment was covered under Medicare? But here’s the condition: You can only deliver one adjustment per week, per person, and you have to demonstrate the measure benefits of those adjustments every three months using impartial objective outcome tools. I guess there would be a minority of DCs who would think they had found easy street and delivered any old adjustment, in any old fashion, without much consideration for where or how they delivered that adjustment - just so long as the cheques kept rolling in. But for the rest of us, we would want to be completely diligent in ensuring that this one adjustment was a good one, a really good one, and that we adjusted the segment which most needed to be adjusted, and in the right direction because you can’t just hit it on both sides - you only get one shot!!

Think about this in the context of how you currently prioritise how you deliver your adjustments each and every day:

1) Do you start at the bottom and work your way up, or some other variation of this theme? Check and adjust the low back, check and adjust the thoracics, then roll them over and check and adjust their neck? Most DCs have an order in which they adjust everyone. It may not be the order I mentioned, but in most cases it will be a “routine” based on the practitioner’s habit as opposed to some patient-centred findings dictating where you start and finish. STOP IT: Take an extra few seconds to analyse your patients’ spines and make a decision about which is the most important adjustment to make on that visit.

2) Do you adjust the same segments in the same order, any three visits in a row? I thought your practice members were supposed to be getting better and progressing to a new level of health - why then would they continue to have the same subluxations? If you are activating retracing in their body then surely the next layer of subluxation should appear and need to be corrected? And, since they last saw you a lot of different stresses have presented, so they may have a new and different layer appearing on the next visit. Why do we say that the body is a self-healing adaptive organism and then fail to adapt and change our adjustments to keep up? BEWARE: If you check your notes and see that patients are getting the same mix of adjustments on every visit then there’s only two options - A) you put the stuck pattern there with your repetitive habituating stimulus, or, B) their spine isn’t evolving under your care - either way you need to try a new strategy.

3) Do you have a system that allows you to make a live analysis and differential diagnosis of which subluxation wants to be adjusted at any given moment in time? When we teach TRT we show you 14 different indicators of subluxation and train you in the differential diagnosis technique that gives you absolute certainty and precision in making this vital decision…

Click Here To Find Out More About TRT Training…

An interesting question arising from my hypothetical above is for our profession as wellness providers. I used the weekly example based on the observation that:

1) If I could get adjusted as often as I liked I would probably get an adjustment every week;

2) I conducted a highly informal survey of a group of my practice members when I asked them “if you could get adjusted whenever you liked and it didn’t cost you anything, how often would you get adjusted?” The most common reply was “I’d come every week”;

3) I have been using functional assessment technologies in my practice for over a decade and have observed qualitatively and quantitatively the biggest changes when clients are getting adjusted weekly (go beyond three weeks and you will see a significant percentage of clients start to deteriorate functionally);

4) Many chiropractors I have met who claim to be wellness DCs get adjusted weekly and recommend weekly adjustments.

But, how much would this cost the community if every man, woman and child was adjusted weekly: Using the round figure of 20 million people and $40 per adjustment, that comes to $800 million per week.

Here’s the ultimate challenge: We would have to be able to demonstrate without a shadow of a doubt that we were saving the Australian economy at least $1 Billion per week? Can we do this? Your thoughts are welcome…