Comments for CHIROPRACTIC EXCELLENCE

Comment on QUANTUM CHIROPRACTIC by Chiropractor Buford

Chiropractor Buford — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:00:46 +0000

Chiropractic care is generally safe if it can be applied skillfully and appropriately. I have to like this natural method because it has no side effect as traditional treatment methods.

Comment on QUANTUM CHIROPRACTIC by admin

admin — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:41:34 +0000

Deep thoughts Robert: TRT defines an adjustment as “communication through touch”: I believe that an adjustment is the most advanced version of “therapeutic touch”. In other words an adjustment is a form of biofeedback or even education and much deeper than a matter realignment. Education doesn’t just happen by talking to someone or handing them a colour brochure - “our actions speak louder than our words” - and the chiropractic action is the adjustment. DD or BJ (not sure which one) described it as communicating innate to innate. Which adds to your thoughts about the state of the Chiropractor - It’s called Intent - and I agree with you - I’ve taught technique to a lot of Chiropractors now and there’s a few I wouldn’t let touch my spine - but it is often that they haven’t ben adjusted themselves enough by a great Chiropractor as much as what is going on “North of their Atlas”…

Comment on QUANTUM CHIROPRACTIC by Robert Marin

Robert Marin — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:04:29 +0000

Therefore if taken to its extreme version….thought is creative…and the mind manifests the thought via its intelligence and converts to matter. Energy without direction is chaos.Is subluxation chaos and matter the end result of this chaos.Ergo if chiropractors adjust the matter without educating the patient of their thought processes are we just like the medics in dealing with the tail of the dog.
Can the chiropractor who is an integral part of the correction be partly responsible for the subluxation by their own thought processes…….maybe chiropractors should not be allowed to adjust until they can create an aligned spine in their own body…..just kidding….or not

Comment on QUANTUM CHIROPRACTIC by Christophe Vever

Christophe Vever — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:29:45 +0000

This article is well put together, allowing novices and experts alike to take part in the thought processes involved in these important concepts. Hopefully this sort of thinking will lead us to ask better research questions in future. It may help us to understand that the collisions which occur intracellularly - at a molecular level - are unlikely to be random, but in fact may be the result of very specific and co-ordinated vibrational frequencies (tone?). Were this found to be true, it would greatly strengthen the argument for the presence of an innate intelligence. Thanks for taking the time to write this.

Comment on QUANTUM CHIROPRACTIC by admin

admin — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:07:07 +0000

Thanks James, you are absolutely right - chiropractic was there. According to my reading Chiropractic was somewhere between 50-75 years ahead of its time in 1927 - in terms of its concepts of healing, understanding of the nervous system, and predating mind/body medicine and psychoneuroimmunology…

Comment on QUANTUM CHIROPRACTIC by Randy

Randy — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:00:10 +0000

Thanks for that. Interesting stuff.
Keep it coming.

Comment on QUANTUM CHIROPRACTIC by John

John — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:59:09 +0000

It was a really good explanation of quantum physics

Comment on QUANTUM CHIROPRACTIC by James Carter

James Carter — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:55:27 +0000

Great article Nick, well done! I agree with you wholehartedly…(I have some minor suggestions for some words….. not to get caught up in semantics and loose the essence of what you are saying. Email me personally if you want.)

I don’t think Chiropractic missed the shift, I think it was already there. I believe it is a minority of chiropractors who missed the shift… those who really don’t understant the chiropractic principles and consequently are trying to find justification in what they do by applying a very limited interpretation of reductionistic thinking. And guess what, many leading researchers agree with that view!

Comment on QUANTUM CHIROPRACTIC by David

David — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:44:59 +0000

Ok this is freaky, we are just in the process of opening a new practice and trying to decide between Quantum Chiropractic, Quantum Family Care, and Quantum Health Centre.

Comment on MAKING EVERY ADJUSTMENT COUNT by Nick

Nick — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:43:57 +0000

I completely respect your views and positions: Here is the challenge for the maturity of our profession – I do not totally agree with your description of our specialty and scope of practice, nor your definition of subluxation: There are areas of similarity and areas that I am not at all in agreement with you. SO – is there room in the profession’s description of itself for the both of us, and for a number of other colleagues who would further spread the definition one way or another?
There are two options:
1) The inclusive view – where all factions of the profession are mature enough to respect each others views AND each others evidence and come up with some kind of description that encompasses the diversity – difficult, most likely heated, possible?
2) The exclusive view – where we sit down and try to determine what we do agree on as the defining similarities between all of us, and then qualify the fringes as specialty interests, perhaps even requiring some degree of post graduate certification?
For example I am not interested in differentially diagnosing what the noxious nociceptive anatomical structure is in a person’s spine, which you may find nauseating to hear. But, I am very interested in the effect that the chiropractic adjustment has on neuroendocrine function and hence state of wellbeing, and brain function. While I have a “general practice” that may look very similar to yours from a number of viewpoints, there are also a bunch of people who seek me out for assistance with addictions, ADHD, depression, anxiety, compulsive disorders and the like, while I might imagine that you have people referred to you because of your skilled ability to diagnose and manage their spinal disorder that no-one else has helped?
Through all the years that I have participated in the growth and development of our profession the thing that has made me most distraught is not the opposing views and the honest and open discussion of these; but the dogma, anger, vindictiveness, even destructiveness with which some viewpoints can try to impose and dictate their agendas on others. (I’m not saying that I feel any of this from you but just sharing a disturbing truth that recurringly surfaces within our ranks)
It’s like the words from a Phil Collins song about war – “if we agree that we can disagree, we can stop all of this today”…